KAMPANYE KESADARAN MASYARAKAT MENGENAI PELESTARIAN CAGAR BUDAYA BERDASARKAN UNDANGUNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2010
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract.
Law Number 11 of 2010 Concerning Cultural Conservation commands people to register their object, building, structure, site, or area which have significant values for the history, science, education, religion, and/or culture to regency/municipal governments for feasibility study as cultural heritage. In order to implement the law, since 2013 the government has conducted socialization to 69% of local governments. However, the responds from regency/municipal governments in terms of organizing cultural heritage registration for public is relatively low. By the end of 2017, there have only been 13.5% of local governments with certified heritage experts and only 4% of local governments that have established cultural heritages. To date, there is none regency/municipal government that has organized cultural heritage registration for public. The purpose of this study is to find solution so that the central government can urge the regency/municipal governments to organize cultural heritage registration for public. This research used literature study to get data about the socialization that have been conducted previously. The literature study was also in form of theoretical review about public awareness campaigns principles and cultural heritage preservation. The result of this study is a recommendation for the central government to organize public awareness campaign about cultural conservation.
Keywords: Cultural conservation, Public awareness campaign, Central government, Local government
Abstrak.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya mengamanatkan masyarakat untuk mendaftarkan benda, bangunan, struktur, situs atau kawasan mereka yang memiliki nilai penting bagi sejarah, ilmu pengetahuan, pendidikan, agama, dan/atau kebudayaan kepada pemerintah kabupaten/kota untuk ditetapkan atau tidak ditetapkan sebagai cagar budaya. Dalam rangka melaksanakan amanat tersebut, sejak tahun 2013 pemerintah telah menyosialisasikan pelestarian cagar budaya kepada 69% pemerintah daerah. Namun demikian, respon pemerintah kabupaten/kota untuk menyelenggarakan pendaftaran cagar budaya milik masyarakat masih relatif rendah. Hingga akhir tahun 2017, hanya terdapat 13.5% pemerintah daerah yang memiliki Tim Ahli Cagar Budaya bersertifikat dan 4% pemerintah daerah yang telah menetapkan cagar budaya. Hingga tulisan ini dibuat belum ada pemerintah kabupaten/kota
yang menyelenggarakan pendaftaran koleksi/properti milik masyarakat untuk ditetapkan sebagai cagar budaya. Permasalahan kajian ini adalah bagaimana pemerintah pusat dapat mendorong pemerintah kabupaten/kota untuk menyelengarakan pendaftaran cagar budaya milik masyarakat. Kajian dalam artikel ini menggunakan kajian kepustakaan terhadap data sosialisasi pendaftaran cagar budaya yang pernah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Pusat. Kajian kepustakaan juga berupa KALPATARU, Majalah Arkeologi Vol. 27 No. 1, Mei 2018 (15-30) 16 tinjauan teoretis mengenai prinsip-prinsip membangkitkan kesadaran masyarakat secara umum dan terhadap pelestarian cagar budaya secara khusus. Hasil kajian mengusulkan agar pemerintah Pusat menyelenggarakan Kampanye Pelestarian Cagar Budaya dengan menggunakan metode kampanye kesadaran masyarakat.
Kata Kunci: Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, Kampanye Kesadaran Masyarakat, Pemerintah Pusat, dan Pemerintah Daerah
Article Details
Authors whose articles are getting published must agree with the following rules:
- Publication rights for all contents published in Kalpataru Journal (printed and online versions) belong to The Board of Directors with acknowledgment of the authors (morale right still belongs to the author)
- Legal formal regulation for digital access to electronic journal follows the rule of Creative Commons license Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), which means Kalpataru Journal is a non-commercial publication, holds the right to keep, format, and manage the articles into the database, maintain, and publish articles
- Published articles both in printed and online versions are accessible for all purposes of education, research, and library archives. The board of directors is not responsible for any violations of the copyrights outside those purposes.
References
Anonim. 1992. Undang Undang No.5 Tahun
Tentang Benda Cagar Budaya.
---------. 2010. Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun
Tentang Cagar Budaya.
---------. 2014. Undang Undang No.23 Tahun
Tentang Pemerintah Daerah.
Azjen, I, and Icek Ajzen. 1991. “The Theory
of Planned Behavior.” Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision
Processes 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.
org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Birch, Jennifer. 2006. “Public Archaeology
and The Cultural Resource Management
Industry in Southern Ontario.” Carleton
University, Ottawa, Ontario.
Bloomfield, Cindy, Rachael K Bommarito,
Benjamin Butler, Kyle R Hawkey,
Michelle W. Kuhl, Jennifer Rea, Jessie
H. Rudi, Michelle D. Sherman, and
Timothy Shortreed. 2015. “Public
Awareness Campaigns,” no. July: 1–50.
Bouder, Scarlett. 2013. “Critical Components
for Public Awareness Campaigns.”
Advocacy Unleashed.
Coffman, Julia. 2002. “Public Communication
Campaign Evaluation.” Harvard Family
Research Project, 1–42.
Grima, Reuben. 2009. “A Reply to ‘ What Is
Public Archaeology ?’” 1 (Grima 2004):
–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/pp.10.
Hartatik. 2014. “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya
Arkeologi: Sebuah Restrospeksi.”
Naditira Widya 8 (2): 95–104.
Madden, T. J., P. S. Ellen, and I. Ajzen. 1992.
“A Comparison of the Theory of Planned
Behavior and the Theory of Reasoned
Action.” Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin 18 (1): 3–9. https://
doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001.
Manders, Martijn R, Christopher J Underwood,
and Erpbrem Vatcharangkul. 2012.
“Unit 17 Public Archaeology Unit 17
Contents.”
Moshenska, Gabriel. 2017. KEY CONCEPTS
IN PUBLIC. London: UCL Press. https://
doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14324/111.
Primadhyta, Safyra. 2017. “CORE: Hasil
Tax Amnesty Jauh Dari Ekspektasi.”
Https://Www.Cnnindonesia.Com/
Ekonomi/20170403103842-78-204494/
Core-Hasil-Tax-Amnesty-Jauh-Dari-
Ekspektasi. 2017. 9 Februari 2018.
Sayers, Richard. 2006. Principles of Awareness-
Raising for Information Literacy: A
Case Study.
Sheppard, Blair H., Jon Hartwick, and Paul
R. Warshaw. 1988. “The Theory of
Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of
Past Research with Recommendations
for Modifications and Future Research.”
Journal of Consumer Research 15 (3):
https://doi.org/10.1086/209170.
Tim Penyusun. 2012. “Laporan Sosialisasi
Pendaftaran Cagar Budaya Bawah Air
KALPATARU, Majalah Arkeologi Vol. 27 No. 1, Mei 2018 (15-30)
Dan Masa Kolonial.” Jakarta.
---------. 2013. “Laporan Pembinaan Registrasi
Cagar Budaya.” Jakarta.
---------. 2014. “Laporan Workshop Pendaftaran
Cagar Budaya.” Jakarta.
Wartha, Ida Bagus Nyoman. 2016. “Manfaat
Penting Benda Cagar Budaya Sebagai
Peninggalan Sejarah/Arkeologi Untuk
Kepentingan Agama, Sosial Budaya,
Sosial Ekonomi, Pendidikan Dan Ilmu
Pengetahuan (Studi Kajian Budaya).”
Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan 6 (2): 189–96.
Weiss, Janet A., and Mary Tschirhart. 1994.
“Public Information Campaigns as
Policy Instruments.” Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management 13 (1): 82.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3325092.
Wibowo, Budi Agus. 2014. “Strategi Pelestarian
Benda / Situs Cagar Budaya Berbasis
Masyarakat.” Jurnal Konservasi Cagar
Budaya Borobudur 8 (1): 58–71.
Sumber gambar
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk,https://
www.tn.gov/environment/about-tdec/
tennessee-historical-commission.html,
https://www.tripadvisor.co.id, https://
es.foursquare.com
http://www.mackaystrategic.com.au/
cultural-tourism/, http://www.
whig.com/20160920/quincy-agateway-
community-for-lincolnnational-
heritage-area, https://www.
visitjacksoncountyky.org/campgrounds